Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
model_name
stringclasses
1 value
model_repo
stringclasses
1 value
public_suite_edition
stringclasses
1 value
vision
dict
text
dict
latency_scope
stringclasses
1 value
private_scores
null
leaderboard_acceptance
stringclasses
1 value
VisionJEV 1.0.0 (4B)
https://huggingface.co/tinnel123/VisionJEV-4B
0.3
{ "index": 73.03369467702923, "complete": true, "requests": 12210, "runtime_errors": 0, "warm_mean_ms": 247.27594685617964, "warm_sum_ms": 3019239.3111139536, "mean_executed_layers": 32, "official_score_sha256": "dd2f0cd170f110903f2af01271d1e8f2095fbed7dc9ca436e47ee4a7a949af2c" }
{ "index": 57.78, "raw_index": 67.71, "complete": true, "requests": 140178, "runtime_errors": 0, "warm_mean_ms": 86.70113558053053, "warm_sum_ms": 12153591.78340761, "mean_executed_layers": 32, "official_score_sha256": "82f0c53a2d34293e22d1ff58e35692ff3193dbc4e9e78a2bde34cc39f704c150" }
submitter MLU measurements; not maintainer RTX PRO 6000 certification
null
pending

VisionJEV 1.0.0 (4B): public evaluation results

Complete public Vision 0.3 and Text 0.3 results for VisionJEV 1.0.0 (4B).

Track Public index Completed requests Warm mean (ms) Mean executed layers
Vision 0.3 73.03369467702923 12,210 247.27594685617964 32
Text 0.3 57.78 140,178 86.70113558053053 32

Both score files declare complete: true, with zero runtime errors or missing requests. Text raw index: 67.71. Private scores and leaderboard acceptance are pending.

Track Official score file Prediction records Runtime settings
Vision vision-scores.json results.jsonl environment.json
Text scores.json results.jsonl environment.json

Warm mean is the sum of second, device-synchronized forward times divided by request count, excluding model loading. Runs use eight independent MLU590-M9DG workers, BF16 inference and all 32 layers. Original score timing fields include the two-call wrapper; warm timing is reported separately. Standardized RTX PRO 6000 latency is pending.

Reproduction instructions and exact settings · Source revisions · Capacity and reproduction limits

Vision benchmark results

Accuracy and chance-corrected skill are percentages. The public index is the weighted mean of clipped skills, using the official weights.

Benchmark Requests Accuracy (%) Skill (%) Weight
CV-Bench 2,038 86.5064 77.7397 1
BLINK 961 74.4017 60.3705 1
RealWorldQA 589 78.2683 64.4855 1
CharXiv 532 80.6391 74.1855 1
InfographicVQA 244 95.9016 94.5355 1
Mind2Web 973 94.2446 92.3261 1
Winoground 800 90.8750 81.7500 1
KIE (CORD+FUNSD) 2,465 95.6187 92.7868 1
Moderation (Hateful Memes) 1,213 77.7411 55.4823 1
R-Bench-M 665 34.7368 21.6724 0.5
MMMU-Pro vision 1,730 39.2486 30.3215 0.25

Text benchmark results

Native metric scores and index skills below are shown on a 0–100 scale; the native metric is not always accuracy. Official JSON files retain the source values and detailed tracks.

Benchmark Requests Native metric Metric × 100 Index skill × 100 Included in index
BFCL 1,694 case exact accuracy 79.75 72.67 Yes
ToolRet 685 nDCG@10 59.84 53.62 Yes
API-Bank 508 accuracy 86.22 85.95 Yes
BANKING77 3,080 macro-F1 90.08 89.95 Yes
CLINC150+OOS 5,500 macro-F1 92.95 92.91 Yes
RouterBench 10,000 selected quality (quality objective) 79.18 51.18 Display only
Home appliance simulator 88 case exact accuracy 72.73 72.73 Yes
SGD/SGD-X 2,500 macro-F1 35.58 0.00 Display only
ContractNLI 123 macro-F1 82.86 75.21 Yes
ANLI 3,200 macro-F1 68.50 52.82 Yes
BPoMP 5,000 accuracy 91.28 83.19 Yes
Humicroedit 2,628 accuracy 61.64 23.29 Yes
POP909-CL 2,000 accuracy 27.50 25.91 Yes
cfcolor 5,000 accuracy 66.36 38.48 Yes
MMLU 14,033 accuracy 79.80 73.07 Display only
GPQA Diamond 196 accuracy 46.43 28.57 Yes
ARC-Easy 2,376 accuracy 99.12 98.83 Display only
ARC-Challenge 1,172 accuracy 95.73 94.31 Display only
WinoGrande 1,267 accuracy 88.32 76.64 Yes
HellaSwag 10,042 accuracy 93.71 91.61 Yes
ChessBench 5,000 accuracy 21.22 14.20 Yes
MuSR 752 accuracy 60.24 36.79 Yes
SATA-Bench 1,650 case exact accuracy 22.55 21.52 Yes
SimpleBench 10 accuracy 30.00 16.00 Display only
BRIGHT 220 nDCG@10 33.61 24.90 Yes
Amazon ESCI 5,000 macro-F1 53.82 42.07 Yes
ACOS 1,565 per-review F1 11.42 8.59 Yes
FinEntity 979 macro-F1 91.87 88.04 Yes
iSarcasmEval 4,600 Sarcasm F1 · track A, English 55.70 43.01 Yes
VAST 3,006 macro-F1 77.39 66.08 Yes
NLI4CT 5,500 macro-F1 82.18 65.33 Yes
CRUXEval 570 accuracy 61.93 39.60 Yes
CLadder 5,000 accuracy 84.70 69.40 Yes
HLE 501 accuracy 9.98 0.00 Yes
Habermas Machine 1,676 accuracy 60.62 42.85 Yes
GSM8K 2,638 accuracy 67.40 61.02 Yes
PhishNChips phishing decisions 2,000 accuracy 73.85 47.70 Yes
MMLU-Pro 12,032 accuracy 59.44 54.38 Yes
BBH fixed-option tasks 5,507 accuracy 72.87 60.68 Yes
RAGTruth response-level hallucination 2,700 F1 on hallucinated class 82.28 63.26 Yes
HoVer claim verification 4,000 accuracy 86.78 73.56 Yes
When2Call MCQ 3,652 accuracy 89.21 85.61 Yes
New Yorker caption matching 528 accuracy 74.62 68.27 Yes

Benchmark questions and images are not included. See the official benchmark terms and bundled license notices.

Downloads last month
228