Xkev

/

Llama-3.2V-11B-cot

like 158

Hi, I'd like to report a License Conflict in Xkev/Llama-3.2V-11B-cot. I noticed that this model appears to be fine-tuned from meta-llama/Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, while being published under the Apache-2.0 license. Given the terms outlined in the LLaMA 3.2 Community License, especially regarding redistribution, attribution, and naming, this combination of licenses could potentially lead to legal or usage misunderstandings.

⚠️ Key violations of LLaMA 3.2 license terms:

Clause 1.b.i – Releasing derivative models must:
  • Include a copy of the original license  
  • Display “Built with Llama”  
  
Clause 1.b.iii – Must retain the following notice in the release:
  “Llama 3.2 is licensed under the Llama 3.2 Community License, Copyright © Meta Platforms, Inc.”

🔹Suggestion:

1. It’s a good idea to explicitly include all key clauses of the LLaMA 3.2 Community License, such as:
   - A copy of the LLaMA 3.2 license in the repository or model card  
   - A visible “Built with LLaMA” label on the model card, documentation, or UI  
   - Including the following notice in a “NOTICE” file or documentation:  
     > “Llama 3.2 is licensed under the LLaMA 3.2 Community License, Copyright © Meta Platforms, Inc.”  
   - A statement clarifying that use of the model must comply with Meta’s Acceptable Use Policy  

2. Maybe we can just drop the Apache-2.0 tag and going with the LLaMA 3.2 Community License.  This approach may help reduce potential confusion about redistribution rights and downstream usage conditions.

Thanks for your attention!