Clarification about small internal previs / R&D usage
Hello,
I am trying to better understand the expected licensing model for a small internal-only evaluation setup using LTX-2.3.
The intended usage would be:
- 4–5 internal users
- Closed local environment
- Internal previs / ideation workflows
- No external distribution
- No customer-facing service
- No LoRA or fine-tuning
- Reference-only outputs (not final production assets)
This would mainly be for internal creative exploration and camera / motion previs.
Would this type of usage generally be considered enterprise/commercial usage for a larger company, or is there a smaller-scale evaluation option typically available?
At this stage I am only trying to understand the expected licensing approach before discussing internally.
Thank you.
Hi @centerV -- please check https://ltx.io/model/license and reach out to the licensing team through the form there!
Thank you for the clarification!
I understand that the licensing team would need to handle the specifics.
Before reaching out formally, I just wanted to better understand whether there is typically an evaluation / internal R&D path for very small closed-team previs usage (around 4–5 users, internal-only, reference outputs).
This would help us determine whether it makes sense to discuss internally first.
Thanks again!
It depends.
@centerV a small clarification, in a company above our limit ARR, using LTX requires a license, even if for internal use, assuming it is a production tool in use for business purposes.
Given a limited usage pattern, i.e. A previz tool for a small team, we have smaller scale licenses.
If it's evaluation of LTX itself to see if it can even be used for this previz tool, that doesn't require a license.