RibAssist 3D: Biplanar Rib-Fracture Detection, Addressing, and Selective 3D Localization from CT-Derived Projections
Abstract
Cross-view pairing of rib fractures in orthogonal CT projections enables accurate 3D localization, but correspondence confidence remains the primary bottleneck.
Rib fractures are common and time-consuming to localize on computed tomography (CT). We ask whether fractures detected independently in two orthogonal CT-derived projections (anteroposterior and lateral) can be paired across views and triangulated into reliable 3D points at a controlled rate of false outputs, and we answer it with a staged diagnostic study. The projection geometry is exact, and given correct correspondence, localization is accurate (median 4.0 mm, 88% within 10 mm, 93.6% rib-exact). On a sealed 55-case cohort, a large share of fractures is in principle recoverable (61.1% dual-view availability, and a correct pair present in the candidate graph for 58.4% of fractures), yet the binding limitation is neither geometry nor localization but confidence-limited cross-view correspondence. A controlled detector-by-correspondence factorial attributes the operational gain to lateral-detector quality rather than the tested matching methods; retraining the lateral detector produces the first nonzero controlled-budget reconstructions. Under a deliberately conservative commitment policy, a pre-specified sealed pass promotes 15 of 601 fractures to correct 3D localizations at 0.436 false points per case (2.50% end-to-end commitment yield), and committed points are accurate (median 1.49 mm, 93% rib-exact). The low yield is a consequence of confidence-gated abstention, not of geometry or detection: the study establishes a reproducible framework for selective 3D localization and identifies cross-view correspondence as the dominant operational bottleneck.
Community
We introduce RibAssist 3D, an open-source research prototype for biplanar rib-fracture detection, anatomical addressing, and selective 3D localization from CT-derived AP and lateral projections.
Rather than forcing a 3D prediction for every detection, the system explicitly models uncertainty and abstains when cross-view evidence is insufficient. The work explores how anatomically constrained multi-view reasoning can support interpretable and reliable 3D fracture localization while exposing the current limitations and opportunities for further research.
Code and demo are publicly available.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Learning Dense 2D-3D Correspondence for X-ray-to-CT Registration of Knee Bones (2026)
- APCReg: Anatomical-Prior-Guided Coarse-to-Fine CBCT--IOS Registration via Multi-View Projection and Reliability-Controlled Residual Correction (2026)
- BODIESReg: An Open-Source Pipeline for Registering 3D Body Scans Using Pose-Aligned Initialization (2026)
- ALTER: Modeling Longitudinal Changes via Regional Differencing for 3D CT Report Generation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608.06914 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 1
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper