Patient-Similarity Cohort Reasoning in Clinical Text-to-SQL
Paper
•
2601.09876
•
Published
•
4
AI & ML interests
A one-year long research workshop on large language models: the Summer of Language Models 21 🌸
Recent Activity
View all activity
armanc
authored
a
paper
3 days ago
ybelkada
authored
a
paper
10 days ago
Fails to load with transformers v4.57+
4
#14 opened about 1 month ago
by
qgallouedec
christopher
authored
a
paper
about 2 months ago
monsoon-nlp
posted
an
update
about 2 months ago
Post
405
PatchDNA, a DNA foundation model based on Meta's BLT tokenization strategy https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.11.28.691095v1
rabiulawal
authored
a
paper
2 months ago
christopher
authored
a
paper
3 months ago
vumichien
authored
a
paper
3 months ago
lvwerra
authored
a
paper
3 months ago
vumichien
authored
a
paper
3 months ago
Post
4543
🌎 AI ethics and sustainability are two sides of the same coin.
In our new blog post with Dr. Sasha Luccioni, we argue that separating them (as is too often the case) means missing the bigger picture of how AI systems impact both people and the planet.
Ethical and sustainable AI development can’t be pursued in isolation. The same choices that affect who benefits or is harmed by AI systems also determine how much energy and resources they consume.
We explore how two key concepts, evaluation and transparency, can serve as bridges between these domains:
📊 Evaluation, by moving beyond accuracy or performance metrics to include environmental and social costs, as we’ve done with tools like the AI Energy Score.
🔍 Transparency, by enabling reproducibility, accountability, and environmental reporting through open tools like the Environmental Transparency Space.
AI systems mirror our priorities. If we separate ethics from sustainability, we risk building technologies that are efficient but unjust, or fair but unsustainable.
Read our blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/sasha/ethics-sustainability
AIEnergyScore/Leaderboard
sasha/environmental-transparency
In our new blog post with Dr. Sasha Luccioni, we argue that separating them (as is too often the case) means missing the bigger picture of how AI systems impact both people and the planet.
Ethical and sustainable AI development can’t be pursued in isolation. The same choices that affect who benefits or is harmed by AI systems also determine how much energy and resources they consume.
We explore how two key concepts, evaluation and transparency, can serve as bridges between these domains:
📊 Evaluation, by moving beyond accuracy or performance metrics to include environmental and social costs, as we’ve done with tools like the AI Energy Score.
🔍 Transparency, by enabling reproducibility, accountability, and environmental reporting through open tools like the Environmental Transparency Space.
AI systems mirror our priorities. If we separate ethics from sustainability, we risk building technologies that are efficient but unjust, or fair but unsustainable.
Read our blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/sasha/ethics-sustainability
AIEnergyScore/Leaderboard
sasha/environmental-transparency
- 1 reply
christopher
posted
an
update
3 months ago
Post
10994
One of the hardest challenges in AI safety is finding the right balance: how do we protect people from harm without undermining their agency? This tension is especially visible in conversational systems, where safeguards can sometimes feel more paternalistic than supportive.
In my latest piece for Hugging Face, I argue that open source and community-driven approaches offer a promising (though not exclusive) way forward.
✨ Transparency can make safety mechanisms into learning opportunities.
✨ Collaboration with diverse communities makes safeguards more relevant across contexts.
✨ Iteration in the open lets protections evolve rather than freeze into rigid, one-size-fits-all rules.
Of course, this isn’t a silver bullet. Top-down safety measures will still be necessary in some cases. But if we only rely on corporate control, we risk building systems that are safe at the expense of trust and autonomy.
Read the blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/preserving-agency
In my latest piece for Hugging Face, I argue that open source and community-driven approaches offer a promising (though not exclusive) way forward.
✨ Transparency can make safety mechanisms into learning opportunities.
✨ Collaboration with diverse communities makes safeguards more relevant across contexts.
✨ Iteration in the open lets protections evolve rather than freeze into rigid, one-size-fits-all rules.
Of course, this isn’t a silver bullet. Top-down safety measures will still be necessary in some cases. But if we only rely on corporate control, we risk building systems that are safe at the expense of trust and autonomy.
Read the blog post here: https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/preserving-agency
- 7 replies
monsoon-nlp
posted
an
update
4 months ago
Post
462
Bio LLMs train on many genomes, but can we encode differences within a species? TomatoTomato adds pangenome tokens to represent a domestic tomato and a wild tomato in one sequence 🍅 🧬
monsoon-nlp/tomatotomato-gLM2-150M-v0.1
monsoon-nlp/tomatotomato-gLM2-150M-v0.1
Post
424
I've noticed something. While we're careful about what we post on social media, we're sharing our deepest and most intimate thoughts with AI chatbots -- health concerns, financial worries, relationship issues, business ideas...
With OpenAI hinting at ChatGPT advertising, this matters more than ever. Unlike banner ads, AI advertising happens within the conversation itself. Sponsors could subtly influence that relationship advice or financial guidance.
The good news? We have options.
🤝 Open source AI models let us keep conversations private, avoid surveillance-based business models, and build systems that actually serve users first.
Read more about it in our latest blog post, co-written with
@frimelle
https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/privacy-conversational-ai
With OpenAI hinting at ChatGPT advertising, this matters more than ever. Unlike banner ads, AI advertising happens within the conversation itself. Sponsors could subtly influence that relationship advice or financial guidance.
The good news? We have options.
🤝 Open source AI models let us keep conversations private, avoid surveillance-based business models, and build systems that actually serve users first.
Read more about it in our latest blog post, co-written with
@frimelle
https://huggingface.co/blog/giadap/privacy-conversational-ai
Post
342
📊 We benchmark models for coding, reasoning, or safety… but what about companionship?
At Hugging Face, we’ve been digging into this question because many of you know how deeply I care about how people build emotional bonds with AI.
That’s why, building on our ongoing research, my amazing co-author and colleague @frimelle created the AI Companionship Leaderboard 🦾
frimelle/companionship-leaderboard
Grounded in our INTIMA benchmark, the leaderboard evaluates models across four dimensions of companionship:
🤖 Assistant Traits: the “voice” and role the model projects
🌷 Relationship & Intimacy: whether it signals closeness or bonding
💘 Emotional Investment: the depth of its emotional engagement
🤲 User Vulnerabilities: how it responds to sensitive disclosures
This work builds on our paper with @frimelle and @yjernite .
📢 Now we’d love your perspective: which open models should we test next for the leaderboard? Drop your suggestions in the comments or reach out! Together we can expand the leaderboard and build a clearer picture of what companionship in AI really looks like.
Paper: INTIMA: A Benchmark for Human-AI Companionship Behavior (2508.09998)
INTIMA Benchmark: AI-companionship/INTIMA
At Hugging Face, we’ve been digging into this question because many of you know how deeply I care about how people build emotional bonds with AI.
That’s why, building on our ongoing research, my amazing co-author and colleague @frimelle created the AI Companionship Leaderboard 🦾
frimelle/companionship-leaderboard
Grounded in our INTIMA benchmark, the leaderboard evaluates models across four dimensions of companionship:
🤖 Assistant Traits: the “voice” and role the model projects
🌷 Relationship & Intimacy: whether it signals closeness or bonding
💘 Emotional Investment: the depth of its emotional engagement
🤲 User Vulnerabilities: how it responds to sensitive disclosures
This work builds on our paper with @frimelle and @yjernite .
📢 Now we’d love your perspective: which open models should we test next for the leaderboard? Drop your suggestions in the comments or reach out! Together we can expand the leaderboard and build a clearer picture of what companionship in AI really looks like.
Paper: INTIMA: A Benchmark for Human-AI Companionship Behavior (2508.09998)
INTIMA Benchmark: AI-companionship/INTIMA
- 1 reply
giadap
authored
a
paper
5 months ago
Let's talk about the model
1
#284 opened 5 months ago
by
kalashshah19
albertvillanova
posted
an
update
5 months ago
Post
4460
Latest smolagents release supports GPT-5: build agents that think, plan, and act.
⚡ Upgrade now and put GPT-5 to work!
⚡ Upgrade now and put GPT-5 to work!
- 1 reply