William J. Marshall

No problem. Experiments are fun, I guess we need a better way of coming up with and sharing novel solutions to problems. I've seen hundreds of people spend thousands of hours finding the same solution in different domains.
It really is a bit of a struggle getting the context window to function independently on new concepts. Figured you could look at what worked and use it. I'd love to see what you come up with..

How do you have the time to do this. Sad bro, go to reddit and do this crap, this platform is meant to be a constructive community. there are enough idiots working against Open Ideas and AI without us tearing each-other down.

We have a few unpublished projects which have automated research environments directed by a main agent inside of a project space where development and context are built and a small research assistant type model charts progress and gives simple progress updates, this pushes the the research but It does stall on some tasks(Mostly assembling the project. It's very janky though so I'm excited to see how your process works, we use sub 14B models mostly. If you want to check out the research suite I can share it with you on Github just shoot an email to either Intelligentestate@gmail.com or ops@cenedril.dev

Feel free to share some of your open source stuff over at the Intelligent Estate page.
The future of AI where the human is the Singularity starts with sequestered local AI. There is a place for Large models on servers but the only logical future is in an Estate/Enterprise agent system, a human interface and regional models.

It's inevitable, lets not take 20 years of blood and tears to get there.

What I'm working on is similar but uses current tech and independent node verification to create systems and communities of wealth and areas where individuals can build on the state of their Art(area of expertise or invention) at the benefit of all and further benefit investors, Making the Human the "Singularity" and enabling the freedoms and liberties we enjoy to continue to thrive.
We should work together on something. intelligentestate@gmail.com.

I'll have to go back and check but I solved the "Doubting itself" before it was finished with a thought issue(It really ruined ANY chance reasoning had of making a positive impact..)

Many of our models posted on intelligent Estate's page have VERY valuable information baked into them. Just using a JavaScript interpreter to do Calculations before reasoning(With Code models) Made the exponentially better.

I can uderstand if you are introducing new information but unless you have a Large context and unlimited compute (So it can reason multiple times and triple check it's work) like google it's better to simply use a larger model.

Asking it to "Do Better" has surprising results.

here you go hexgrad, https://huggingface.co/bartowski/uncensoredai_UncensoredLM-DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B-GGUF

However if you do not have the resources to run a 600B model I would use a Qwen base, contact Intelligent Estate. they take agent production jobs

You can find many AI experts with specialized skills on Ko-Fi

I don't know what you are talking about. clarify please.

Not sure what you mean but removing politically charged materials from their training data is absolutely something they do. Not sure what you are looking for so I don't exactly know how to help you most of the information you are looking for as far as abliteration is VERY available.

By design, it probably will not have what you are looking for in it's training data unless it is an answer it can reason or calculate or something widely talked about like Tienanmen square and is already in the layers like Deepseek it was probably trained unsupervised and without santizizating from llama model layers. for historical or cultural accuracy google is the model to focus on (As it doesn't sensor most historical facts and is largely free in their AI studio. )
If you are looking for models for information extraction Ironically one of the best IE models is a Chinese model from THU-KEG we made a Quant or two of it https://huggingface.co/IntelligentEstate/Keg_Party-DPO-1.5B-Q8_0-GGUF

With the release of the Copyright Law paper I'd say the market could react in various ways, as OpenAI has less of an incentive to be more open and overall any output of an AI is simply not copyrightable. We are going to see guarding of certain models with proprietary use cases like curing cancer or in the case of Ideogram, openAI and SUNO they can't claim ownership of anything anyone else created with their models. I wrote a decent article that sums it up pretty well but I think the market might take a while to digest that and that may be part of the reason for this fall(And the insider sell off)